The conda package and environment manager is included in all versions of Anaconda and Miniconda. Anaconda Repository. Conda is also included in Anaconda Enterprise, which provides on-site enterprise package and environment management for Python, R, Node.js, Java and other application stacks. The fastest way to obtain conda is to install Miniconda, a mini version of Anaconda that includes only conda and its dependencies. If you prefer to have conda plus over 720 open source packages, install Anaconda.
Actual BehaviorI had missing conda.exe in Continuumanaconda3Scripts folder, so conda command doesn't work. This is not PATH problem.
After that I have uninstalled anaconda, rebooted and installed just downloaded last version of anaconda. Installation was without admin rights. After that I still have conda missing in that folder. So conda command doesn't workWhat can I do? Is where a way to install conda eventually? Expected BehaviorRunning conda command Steps to ReproduceInstall anaconda with admin right. After that install without admin rights.
Get missing conda.exePS I have previously installed Anaconda. Which I believe was installed with admin rights to whole users. Can it cause such problem?
Anaconda or Miniconda version: 5.01 Operating System: Windows 10 conda infono conda. On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 12:28 AM adityajanardhan.@. wrote:Yeah same issue here as well. Tried setting environment variable too. Itsneither recognising conda nor its able to find the path using 'where conda'.—You are receiving this because you commented.Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub,or mute the thread.
News about the dynamic, interpreted, interactive, object-oriented, extensible programming language PythonIf you are about to ask a 'how do I do this in python' question, please try, or the #python IRC channel on FreeNode.Please don't use URL shorteners. Suffice to say that I'm not really seeing the huge draw.The same reason that people comfortable writing code in Eclipse or emacs don't see the draw of Pycharm or visual studio. If Anaconda doesn't provide a benefit, no problem, there's no obligation to use it or even try it. Requests doesn't provide anything not already available in the standard modules, but that doesn't mean that people don't appreciate the effort in providing a simpler packaged solution. Same with Anaconda vs installing everything from pip.
Does anaconda have a dramatically better user experience than pip and virtualenv? Is anaconda an improvement for people already experienced using different tools in the python ecosystem that solve the same problems?The answers are yes and yes, if they are qualified with 'windows doing science'. At least a few years ago, getting both matplotlib and numpy up and running was nontrivial, and ran the risk of discovering dll hell.Also, irrespective of OS, if there is a need to maintain legacy code in a variety of minor versions of the interpreter (e.g. 2.5, 2.6.2, 2.7.10) (looking at you, science!), this is rendered trivial, since the interpreter is treated as simply another package. If you're developing in a Windows environment the most significant advantage is ease of installation. Although, it's a lot easier for someone new to python to install one Anaconda package, even if it's 350MB, than to hunt down each individual package and install the wheel with pip. This has the advantage of lowering the pain threshold for someone who wants to experiment with ipython notebook or pandas or some other useful tool and will likely result in them starting down the road to learning Python.
If they can't even get numpy installed because of pip compiler error, they're more likely to not experience that initial thrill and not pursue the language. I've been enjoying working on OS X. Office applications with good enough compatibility with the Windows versions for what I do (although apparently the next Mac release is going to finally bridge that gap) so that I'm able to work in that environment when necessary, but have the benefits of running on.nix the rest of the time. Most packages that work on other.nix platforms should either be compatible or be easy to find someone detailing the minor tweaks you need to get it working; I think only once did I find myself stymied trying to get a Unix package working on OS X.(I do keep Windows installed in Parallels for times where there just isn't a Mac option, but I prefer to not have to use it when I don't have to.).